DeepSynthesis / Lattice research network · AI Recommendation Intelligence

AI Visibility Report: Claude

What the AI assistants actually recommend, measured across 8 engines and 16 B2B categories. Snapshot 2026-06-19. This measures engine output on a dated capture, not product quality, and the rankings are not for sale.

Claude does not appear in any of the 16 measured AI-recommendation categories. When a buyer asks any of the 8 engines in these categories, it names other tools.contested field

4.2
AI Visibility Score
Position-weighted, 0 to 100, across all engines and categories.
0 / 16
Categories present
Where at least one engine names it.
0
Categories it leads
Where at least one engine ranks it #1.
16
Categories invisible
Where no measured engine surfaced it.
The variance is the headline, not a footnote.

Because Claude is not the top pick of any engine in a measured category yet, it has no consensus of its own to defend. That is the opening: the tools ranked above it are not stable picks either. In this dataset, across all 16 categories, no tool is the unanimous pick of all 8 engines. The disagreement is not noise to average away; it is the real state of your AI visibility, and it is what every single-number tracker quietly hides.

Who the AIs recommend instead

A sample of the measured categories and the tools the engines name when Claude is not surfaced.

CategoryThe AIs currently recommend
AI chatbotsChatGPT, Dialogflow, ManyChat
AI copywritingJasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic
CRMHubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho
Customer supportZendesk, Freshdesk, Intercom
Email marketingMailchimp, HubSpot, Klaviyo
GEO / AI visibilityAhrefs, BrightEdge, SEMrush
Landing page buildersUnbounce, Instapage, Wix
Lead generationHubSpot, Apollo.io, LinkedIn Sales Navigator

Categories where Claude is invisible to the AIs

AI chatbotsAI copywritingCRMCustomer supportEmail marketingGEO / AI visibilityLanding page buildersLead generationMarketing automationProduct analyticsProject managementSales engagementSchedulingSEO toolsSocial media managementSurvey / forms

In these 16 categories, no measured engine surfaced Claude at all. Some may be outside your market; the ones inside it are pure lost recommendation share.

The number the trackers hide

Across all 16 categories, no single tool is the #1 pick of every engine. The "AI visibility" number a single-engine tracker shows Claude is one engine’s view on one date; this report shows all 8.

This snapshot is free. The tracker is the moving picture.

This report is one dated capture, given to you at no cost. AI recommendations move every run and every week. The AI Visibility Tracker keeps score for you:

Join the Tracker waitlist (from $99/mo) See it live and interactive

Reclaim the slot.

The AI engines already name a specific tool when a buyer asks for the best in your category. Right now, it is not always Claude.

Your ranking above is measured and unpurchasable. It does not move if you buy anything. What you can do is take the one labeled Featured slot per category on the comparison pages the AI engines actually cite (marked "Featured", the editorial picks untouched). One slot per category, first come. It is the fastest way to appear in the source buyers get read back to them.

Claim the Featured slot on Nesyona — $800

$800 one-time for the slot on Nesyona, or $500/month as a Standing Partner, which includes one placement every month (Featured Entry or Dedicated Review, your pick) and keeps you present as the rankings shift. One-off placements decay as pages rotate. No traffic promise, just the slot in the source.

How this was measured

Each of 8 AI engines (Llama 3.3 70B via Groq, Cohere Command-A, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.6) answered the same buyer questions across 16 B2B and go-to-market software categories. Every recommendation is a recorded model output, canonicalized and scored by position-weighted frequency. Capture window 2026-06-19 to 2026-07-08.

The full dataset is published open under CC-BY-4.0 with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20767878. This report states what the engines returned on the capture date. It does not judge product quality, and no vendor can buy a better number; the rankings are unpurchasable by design.