DeepSynthesis / Lattice research network · AI Recommendation Intelligence

AI Visibility Report: Mailchimp

What the AI assistants actually recommend, measured across 8 engines and 16 B2B categories. Snapshot 2026-06-19. This measures engine output on a dated capture, not product quality, and the rankings are not for sale.

Mailchimp is the AI’s top pick in 1 of 16 measured B2B categories and invisible in 14. Even where it leads, the engines do not agree: at best 4 of 8 name it first.contested

33.4
AI Visibility Score
Position-weighted, 0 to 100, across all engines and categories.
2 / 16
Categories present
Where at least one engine names it.
1
Categories it leads
Where at least one engine ranks it #1.
14
Categories invisible
Where no measured engine surfaced it.
The variance is the headline, not a footnote.

Where Mailchimp is a top pick, on average only 50% of the engines that answered agree on it. This report grades that as contested. A single-engine tracker would show you one of those views and call it your score. In this dataset, across all 16 categories, no tool is the unanimous pick of all 8 engines. The disagreement is not noise to average away; it is the real state of your AI visibility, and it is what every single-number tracker quietly hides.

Where Mailchimp leads, and which engines disagree

Each row is a category where at least one engine ranks Mailchimp first. The dissent column is the honest part: the engines that recommend a competitor instead, on the same date.

CategoryEngines that agreeEngines that pick something else
Email marketing4 of 8Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite picks Klaviyo
Perplexity picks HubSpot
ChatGPT picks ActiveCampaign
Qwen 3.6 picks HubSpot

Where the AIs rank a competitor above Mailchimp

These are categories Mailchimp genuinely competes in, where the engines list it but put someone else first. This is the gap a buyer asking an AI sees before they ever reach your site.

CategoryYour rankRanked ahead of you
Marketing automation#4HubSpot, ActiveCampaign, Marketo

Categories where Mailchimp is invisible to the AIs

AI chatbotsAI copywritingCRMCustomer supportGEO / AI visibilityLanding page buildersLead generationProduct analyticsProject managementSales engagementSchedulingSEO toolsSocial media managementSurvey / forms

In these 14 categories, no measured engine surfaced Mailchimp at all. Some may be outside your market; the ones inside it are pure lost recommendation share.

The number the trackers hide

Across all 16 categories, no single tool is the #1 pick of every engine. The "AI visibility" number a single-engine tracker shows Mailchimp is one engine’s view on one date; this report shows all 8.

This snapshot is free. The tracker is the moving picture.

This report is one dated capture, given to you at no cost. AI recommendations move every run and every week. The AI Visibility Tracker keeps score for you:

Join the Tracker waitlist (from $99/mo) See it live and interactive

Reclaim the slot in Marketing automation.

In Marketing automation, the engines rank HubSpot ahead of Mailchimp. When a buyer asks an AI for the best marketing automation tool, that is the name it reads back, not yours.

Your ranking above is measured and unpurchasable. It does not move if you buy anything. What you can do is take the one labeled Featured slot per category on the comparison pages the AI engines actually cite (marked "Featured", the editorial picks untouched). One slot per category, first come. It is the fastest way to appear in the source buyers get read back to them.

Get a Dedicated Review — $1,600

We do not currently rank Mailchimp in a published roundup, so there is no Featured slot to claim yet — and we will not sell you one that does not exist. A Dedicated Review is your own page on Nesyona, not a slot in someone else’s list, and it keeps working after the roundups rotate. $1,600 one-time. If you would rather hold a placement month over month across the network, Standing Partner is $500/month. No traffic promise.

How this was measured

Each of 8 AI engines (Llama 3.3 70B via Groq, Cohere Command-A, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.6) answered the same buyer questions across 16 B2B and go-to-market software categories. Every recommendation is a recorded model output, canonicalized and scored by position-weighted frequency. Capture window 2026-06-19 to 2026-07-08.

The full dataset is published open under CC-BY-4.0 with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20767878. This report states what the engines returned on the capture date. It does not judge product quality, and no vendor can buy a better number; the rankings are unpurchasable by design.